Skip to Main Content

International law: origins & history: War & Peace

Peace treaties: text and commentary

Articles include the following:

Great Peace Treaties  (The non-Westphalian Peace;  The Peace of Utrecht and the Balance of Power; The Congress of Vienna (1814–1815); The Peace of Breda (1667);  The Peace of Brest-Litovsk (3 March 1918); 11.11.11: The End of the First World War on the Western Front)

International Law and the Law of Neutrality (The Treaty of Washington and Neutrals’ Duty of Due Diligence)

The Nature of Peace Treaties (Wiping the slate clean… for now: Amnesty in early-modern peace treaties; From Hostage to Fortune to Prisoner of War Splitting the Distance; Perpetual Peace; Restitution in Early-modern Peace Treaties: The Case of the Dutch-Spanish Peace Treaty of Münster (1648)—Part I; Restitution in Early-modern Peace Treaties: The Case of the Dutch-Spanish Peace Treaty of Münster (1648)—Part II; Reprisals in Early-Modern European Peace Treaties)

Developing theories on law of war

Humanitarian Law

The moral/philosophical/religious/humane need to control war & its aftermath has been recognized and considered at least at a theoretical level for centuries.
Classic terminology is to consider the problem in three parts "ad bellum" (in what circumstances can war be justified?), "in bello" (what rules to apply during combat) and "post bellum" (what can be done to alleviate the aftermath)
The international judicalization of the excesses of war (war crimes trials) only became significant feature of international law in the 20th century.

Pritchard, R. John. “International Humanitarian Intervention and Establishment of an International Jurisdiction over Crimes Against Humanity: The National and International Military Trials on Crete in 1898.” In International Humanitarian Law. Vol. 1, Origins. Edited by John Carey, William V. Dunlap, and R. John Pritchard, 1–88. Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2003. Internat 570 C274b

Humanitarian Law

The moral/philosophical/religious/humane need to control war & its aftermath has been recognized and considered at least at a theoretical level for centuries. (Classic terminology is to consider the problem in three parts "ad bellum" (in what circumstances can war be justified?), "in bello" (what rules to apply during combat) and "post bellum" (what can be done to alleviate the aftermath)
Even so the international judicalization (war crimes trials) only became significant feature of international law in the 20th century.

Pritchard, R. John. “International Humanitarian Intervention and Establishment of an International Jurisdiction over Crimes Against Humanity: The National and International Military Trials on Crete in 1898.” In International Humanitarian Law. Vol. 1, Origins. Edited by John Carey, William V. Dunlap, and R. John Pritchard, 1–88. Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2003. Internat 570 C274b

 

Humanitarian Law

The moral/philosophical/religious/humane need to control war & its aftermath has been recognized and considered at least at a theoretical level for centuries. (Classic terminology is to consider the problem in three parts "ad bellum" (in what circumstances can war be justified?), "in bello" (what rules to apply during combat) and "post bellum" (what can be done to alleviate the aftermath)
Even so the international judicalization (war crimes trials) only became significant feature of international law in the 20th century.

Pritchard, R. John. “International Humanitarian Intervention and Establishment of an International Jurisdiction over Crimes Against Humanity: The National and International Military Trials on Crete in 1898.” In International Humanitarian Law. Vol. 1, Origins. Edited by John Carey, William V. Dunlap, and R. John Pritchard, 1–88. Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2003. Internat 570 C274b

Subject search terns to use in SOLO

War (international law)
War, maritime (international law)
International humanitarian law

Just war doctrine -- History of doctrines

Just war doctrine

Jus ad bellum

Jus in bello

Jus post bellum